« Throw Baldwin to the Dogs | Main | Ring the Bell - It's Time to Play Family Values Hypocrisy! »

E. J. Dionne Nails Bush

Washington Post Op-Ed columnist E.J. Dionne Jr. nailed President Bush with his column this morning, highlighting the foam and air in Bush's recent "arguments" against a timetable for Iraq.

The president's comments this week were less measured. "I will strongly reject an artificial timetable withdrawal," Bush said, "and/or Washington politicians trying to tell those who wear the uniform how to do their job."

Let's parse that statement. The notion that Congress has an "artificial timetable" suggests there must be such a thing as a "natural timetable." But what would that be? Presumably, the president would reply: when we achieve victory. But what is the definition of "victory" in the murky mess we're in? The administration offers only generalities that lead us nowhere.

And it's beyond chutzpah for a politician who has lived at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. for more than 2,280 days to attack "Washington politicians." Didn't Petraeus get his orders to pursue the surge from a certain Washington politician otherwise known as the commander in chief?

Dionne goes on to filet some of V.P.Cheney's recent Random Acts of Mindless-ness, and then addresses the White House's chances of success using their tactic of attacks...

What Bush and Cheney are doing is not just wrong. It's dangerous. If they were interested in success in Iraq, they would have turned down the partisan rhetoric long ago. A substantial majority now opposes their policies. The last thing the administration needs is more polarization, which clearly has not worked in its favor.

The president needs to convince Americans that a decent result in Iraq is still possible. Above all, he needs to answer the essential question: If we shouldn't have timetables now, how long does he think we'll need to keep combat forces in Iraq? Two years? Five years? More? And to what end?

President Bush is providing no answers for the American People. Congress says we want a timetable, and Bush says "no" and then attacks Congress as being unpatriotic. Congress says "how much more time will it take?" and Bush says "I don't know" and then has his lap dog Cheney attack.

Bush is acting against the wishes of the American people, and the sentiment in favor of withdrawing from Iraq has been increasing. Sooner or later he will recognize his error in prolonging this war further, but it now appears that he will be the very last person in the country to admit that fact.

E. J. Dionne Jr. - Bush's Non-Argument


Note: Wizbang Blue is now closed and our authors have moved on. Paul Hooson can now be found at Wizbang Pop!. Please come see him there!

  • Currently 2.2/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 2.2/5 (5 votes cast)


Comments (3)

horse:

I disagree that he "nailed" him in any way regarding his comments and the timetable issue. There are objectives, a plan and resources for the current surge undertaking. Even then, a successful surge does not result in an immediate withdraw of US forces. There is no timetable of US withdraw to communicate if there is no withdraw in the short or mid-term time periods. E. J. Dionne is just throwing up a weak and easy straw man. Standard MO for a hack.

There is no bipartisan support to build since the left does not want to support it regardless of anything. There is nothing that will change their behavior or words, nothing. So, no partnership in any form is possible. One can only say "I hear you, but we gotta do what we gotta do." You can elect your full lefty gov in 2008 to try and get what you want, but don't be surprised if it is WWIII.

horse:

Oh yeah, good luck with the new site :)

Jim:

Bush has never used the word "unpatriotic" when attacking the Democrat's bill to attach a time table to troop funding in Iraq.

Suggesting that a policy idea of the Democrats could be harmful to the troops, or U.S. national security is not the equivalent of suggesting they are "unpatriotic," rather it is a valid argument that is worthy of discussion.

Attempting to make certain topics "out of bounds" my claiming they "question patriotism" (another past example of this is the charge of "red baiting") merely is a attempt to stifle reasonable debate from taking place.


Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Advertisments

Categories

Archives

Technorati



Add to Technorati Favorites

Credits

Publisher: Kevin Aylward

Editors: Lee Ward, Larkin, Paul S Hooson, and Steve Crickmore

All original content copyright © 2007 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark. Wizbang Blue™ is a trademark of Wizbang®, LLC.

Powered by Movable Type 3.35

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.