« "Green" Democrats? | Main | Student Arrested for Writing Essay »

The First Diaspora of the Twenty-First Century: the Iraqis

Originally, the term "diaspora" was used to refer to Jewish communities who were forced to leave Israel and go into exile in the 6th century BC. Since then, it has evolved into a more general term to describe any group of people usually defined by an ethnic or religious sect who have been scattered among countries outside of their original homelands. Ironically, people now refer to the "Palestinian" diaspora to identify the estimated 4.5 million Palestinians who now live outside of Israel, Gaza and the West Bank, mostly in neighboring Arab countries like Jordan and Lebanon.

George Bush has been fond of calling the war on terror the first war of the twenty-first century. It's unlikely, however, that we will ever hear him claim that the Iraqi diaspora is the first diaspora of the twenty-first century. But that is exactly what is happening.

The war in Iraq has displaced four million people from their homes. Two million of those have become refugees with the vast majority heading to Syria and Jordan. The UN estimates that 50,000 Iraqis flee the country every month.

Syria, often vilified by the Bush administration for it's alleged interference in Iraq, has been the most generous in accommodating displaced Iraqis, accepting about 1.2 million so far. Jordan has taken in 750,000, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states have taken 200,000, while Iran has taken 54,000 and Lebanon has accepted 40,000.

Disgracefully, the US has not been accommodating at all in taking in Iraqi refugees. Over the past four years, the US has resettled just 466 Iraqi refugees. This is ironic given our significant level of responsibility in creating the Iraqi diaspora in the first place. But recently, George Bush has decided to become much more generous on this point:

Bending under significant pressure from the international community, the Bush administration has agreed to admit as many as 20,000 Iraqi refugees to the US this year.

20,000 is, of course, a tiny fraction (half of one percent to be exact) of the 4 million Iraqis who have been displaced from their homes as a direct result of our invasion and mishandled occupation of Iraq. Surely, Mr. President, we can be more generous than that?

Iraq's neighbors are shouldering a huge share of the burden, some of them with little or no assistance from the US. Iraqi refugees have swelled Jordan's population by an astonishing 10%. On a per capita basis, a similar influx into the US would be on the order of some 30 million people! Imagine the uproar and instability that this would create if it had happened here.

Kenneth Pollack and Daniel Byman of the Brookings Institution present the potentially dire consequences of the Iraqi diaspora:


Most Iraqi refugees are not in camps, but dispersed among local populations. But refugees, whether in camps or not, can also corrode state power from the inside, fomenting the radicalization of domestic populations and encouraging rebellion against host governments. The burden of caring for hundreds of thousands of refugees is heavy, straining government administrative capacity and possibly eroding public support for regimes shown to be weak, unresponsive, or callous. And the sudden presence of armed fighters with revolutionary aspirations can lead disaffected local clans or co- religionists to ally with the refugees against their own government, especially when an influx of one ethnic or religious group upsets a delicate demographic balance, as would likely be the case in some of Iraq's neighbors.

We are still just on the cusp of what could become a much larger problem if Iraq devolves into a full-scale civil war. Iraqi Sunni refugees could tip the balance of power in Syria against Bashar Assad's Shiite-dominated regime. Shiites are just 12% of the population in that country with the majority of the rest Sunni. Radical Sunni extremists would be the most likely group to take power in Syria in the event of the fall of the Assad regime. Jordan's pro-Western regime could be toppled by local extremist elements aided by Iraqi Sunni refugees. Kuwait's pro-Western regime could be threatened as Shiite refugees from Iraq increase the Shiite population of that country which is currently about one-third.

Given all this, wouldn't you think we could accept a few more Iraqi refugees than a scant 20,000?



Note: Wizbang Blue is now closed and our authors have moved on. Paul Hooson can now be found at Wizbang Pop!. Please come see him there!

  • Currently 3/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 3/5 (4 votes cast)


Comments (1)

Only 20,000 Iraqi refugees - and they will probably be subjected to the same onerous provisions of the Patriot Act that have resulted in huge problems over the last few years.

But thousands of vulnerable refugees have been prevented from receiving asylum or being resettled in the U.S. because of sweeping immigration provisions included in the USA PATRIOT Act and the REAL ID Act that relate to "material support" to "terrorist" organizations.

The government's concept of "material support" is so broad that it ends up affecting refugees who do not support terrorism, and even refugees who are actually the victims of violent groups - like Colombian refugees who have been forced to pay money to armed militants. These flawed provisions have also prevented Burmese religious minorities from receiving asylum or resettlement. Their contributions to ethnic organizations that have armed wings opposing the Burmese regime have been categorized as "material support" to "terrorist" organizations - even though the U.S. government has roundly condemned the Burmese regime's repression of religious and ethnic minorities.

Every move the Republicans make betrays the fact that they could care less about a democracy in Iraq and about the welfare of the Iraqi people. Diaspora is absolutely the right term for what is taking place.

Check out this poll from 3 years ago where only one third of the Iraqi people believed that our presence in their country was doing more good than harm.

Now millions have been displaced from their homes and thousands and thousands of Iraqis killed in bombings and attacks, and still a third of the citizens in our country are sitting on their hands -- doing nothing to stop this madness -- because they just can't admit they made a mistake in supporting the continuance of this failed, disastrous move on the part of the Republicans in Washington.


Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Advertisments

Categories

Archives

Technorati



Add to Technorati Favorites

Credits

Publisher: Kevin Aylward

Editors: Lee Ward, Larkin, Paul S Hooson, and Steve Crickmore

All original content copyright © 2007 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark. Wizbang Blue™ is a trademark of Wizbang®, LLC.

Powered by Movable Type 3.35

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.