« Conservative Defends War Profiteering | Main | Who Won Last Night's Republican Debate? »

Bid To Make Chrysler America's Largest Worker Owned Company Fails

A bid by billionaire Kirk Kerkorian to purchase the financially troubled American automaker, Chrysler, from German owner, Daimler, and include the employees of Chrysler as co-owners fell short on Monday, when an equity firm headed by former Bush Administration Treasury Secretary, John Snow, Cerberus Capital Management won the bidding battle by offering $7.4 billion for the financially troubled company that was once worth $36 billion to Daimler when they first purchased the company back in 1998.

Under the tough politically and financially conservative, John Snow, workers at Chrysler can only expect to face far more wage, health care and pension cuts, and also more job cuts as the company may even be split into profitable portions and then sold to other corporations. Some Chinese automakers have expressed an interest in Chrysler, hoping to gain a foothold in the U.S. market with an established network of dealers already in place. The always profitable Jeep division could even be separated from the automobile divisions, which might be a good formula for a Chinese bid to buy some of the manufacturing plants. But the bottom line is that ownership by an equity capital firm is almost always bad news for workers in a targeted takeover company.

Rather than face an uncertain job future, workers at Chrysler would have been far better off with a buyout of the company using a plan such as employee stock ownership to stake their share in the company. Largest worker owned companies include supermarkets such as Publix, Hy-Vee and Price Chopper. Unfortunately the role of employee owned workplaces is rather limited in the American economy. leaving most employees at the mercy of management in which most don't even have the basic job protections of a labor union to protect their jobs, wages, health or retirement benefits, or ability to bargain effectively with management.

Workers need to organize not only into labor unions to better protect their ability to bargain with management, but by using employee owned stock ownership plans, workers can remove management altogether and become their own masters by controlling their own destiny and employment future. A steady slide in wages and benefits as well as job layoffs is often the other alternative under the private management economic model.

Note: Wizbang Blue is now closed and our authors have moved on. Paul Hooson can now be found at Wizbang Pop!. Please come see him there!

  • Currently 3/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 3/5 (4 votes cast)

Comments (4)

U.P. Man:

How much did Kirk Kerkorian and the employees offer?

What percentage would the employees have owned?

Would your headline have been "Billionaire rides Chrysler employee to more" if they had offered the most?


I just wanted to remind everyone of the disconnect between wanting Big Auto to become solvent again during a time of alleged global warming.

Also: If automakers from other countries are making cars for lower cost that keep their resale value better, we should be asking ourselves: how is it possible? Do they have better engineers? Do they have fewer workers? Do they pay their workers less in wage and benefits? Do they have a smaller corporate bureaucracy? In what areas are they more efficient?

After all, it's not like they're cheating somehow. They sell their products (many made in America!) in the marketplace, for a price the customer thinks it's worth. Read Atlas Shrugged again, and ask yourself: how much of the inefficiency is due to profit-leeches, who don't do work but do get paid?


I agree with you on that. Taking it one step further, Huge profits made on the backs of the people who are physically doing the work, and cutting their wages and benefits at the same time is not the answer either.
CEO's getting huge increases in salary while the lower people lose or stay the same in wages really show family values, doesn't it?

Sales of American-made gas guzzling SUVs have been dropping in light of today's gasoline prices - who's surprised by that? The administration and Congress should have moved curtail the increase in sales of the gas guzzlers - regardless of Iraq - but certainly in light of Iraq - and they didn't.

I'm fine letting the "marketplace decide" - but in our own self-interests our nation should have taken steps to protect our auto industry by steering them in the right direction, and failed to do so.

Now we're not only dependent on foreign oil, but to a greater and greater extent dependent on foreign-made cars as well. We don't win when this happens... We lose jobs.


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]





Add to Technorati Favorites


Publisher: Kevin Aylward

Editors: Lee Ward, Larkin, Paul S Hooson, and Steve Crickmore

All original content copyright © 2007 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark. Wizbang Blue™ is a trademark of Wizbang®, LLC.

Powered by Movable Type 3.35

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.