« Truck Bomber Turns Against Jihad | Main | Satirizing NZ Parliament a Felony »

Republicans Just Love Their Voting Machines

The New York Times is reporting that computer scientists easily hacked into voting machines used throughout California.

Computer scientists from California universities have hacked into three electronic voting systems used in California and elsewhere in the nation and found several ways in which vote totals could potentially be altered, according to reports released yesterday by the state.

This comes as no surprise to those of who work in the software industry and understand the challenges of securing and hardening our products. Thankfully, the Democrat-controlled Congress is moving to rectify the situation and restore integrity to our balloting process:

The reports, the latest to raise questions about electronic voting machines, came to light on a day when House leaders announced in Washington that they had reached an agreement on measures to revamp voting systems and increase their security.

The House bill would require every state to use paper records that would let voters verify that their ballots had been correctly cast and that would be available for recounts.

The House majority leader, Representative Steny H. Hoyer, Democrat of Maryland, and the original sponsor of the bill, Representative Rush D. Holt, Democrat of New Jersey, said it would require hundreds of counties with paperless machines to install backup paper trails by the presidential election next year while giving most states until 2012 to upgrade their machines further.

The vulnerabilities that have now been exposed could induce the California Secretary of State to decertify these voting machines for the 2008 election setting off a scramble among California's counties to come up with a replacement. As is often the case, the scientists discovered that security was an afterthought for these devices and not part of the original design.

Matthew A. Bishop, a professor of computer science at the University of California, Davis, who led the team that tried to compromise the machines, said his group was surprised by how easy it was not only to pick the physical locks on the machines, but also to break through the software defenses meant to block intruders.

Professor Bishop said that all the machines had problems and that one of the biggest was that the manufacturers appeared to have added the security measures after the basic systems had been designed.

Personally, I prefer optical scanning systems like the Diebold Accu-Vote OS. The system is low-tech and provides an indisputable paper trail that can be manually recounted if necessary. Congressional Republicans on the other hand, because of their close ties to the voting machine industry, generally prefer the highest tech systems with no paper trail and the greatest level of vulnerabilities and insecurity. Republicans just love their voting machines, and they will be squealing like stuck pigs as the Democrats move legislation to restore integrity to our voting procedures. Just watch.


Note: Wizbang Blue is now closed and our authors have moved on. Paul Hooson can now be found at Wizbang Pop!. Please come see him there!

  • Currently 3.4/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 3.4/5 (5 votes cast)


Comments (8)

Allen:

Anything that can be corrupted the Grand Old Preverts like. They even support our military so much that they can't even tell the truth about Pat Tillman's death. The CnC claims privilege on all the paperwork concerning his death.

WHY is that?

J.R.:

Not a single mention of why Republicans love voting machines nor any Republican decrying this move, yet your title cites Republicans. How typical and pathetic of the Wizblue authors.

kim:

No shame, JR; they're partisan sophists and proud of their professionalism.
========================

Lee Ward:

Reading is Fundamental flunkie J.R.: "Not a single mention of why Republicans love voting machines nor any Republican decrying this move, yet your title cites Republicans. How typical and pathetic of the Wizblue authors."

Larkin's Post: "Congressional Republicans on the other hand, because of their close ties to the voting machine industry, generally prefer the highest tech systems with no paper trail and the greatest level of vulnerabilities and insecurity."

Apparently kim flunked out too - or was she just so anxious to get in a bit of sophistry of her own that she didn't bother to fact-check JR before agreeing with him/her?

Latter - definitely the latter...

How typical and pathetic of the Wizbang conservatives.

bryanD:

Diebold's CEO O'Dell promising to deliver Florida for Bush. Having to resign.

Why are Republican politicians generally hep for E voting?
Because they recognize that, despite APPEARANCES due to Senate's Constitutional design to balance smaller (western, more-Republican) states with more populous (Democratic) ones, and the House districts that favor status quo, the country is generally moderate, and in normal times favors the Democrats. The statehouses are a bellweather of this. More and more they're default: Democratic. The Republican governors are usually moderate as well viz RNC.

This was answered aboveboard by the GOP's Big Tent strategy that governors have always employed. But since those attracted to this idea are mainly not your typical Republican (indeed, are Democrats), dirty tricks not technically illegal, are the Plan. Cheat and blame the machine if caught.

Paul Hamilton:

Kim and JR: Ensuring that elections are as cheat-proof as possible is not a partisan issue. I find it impossible to understand why any politician would support a method of voting which has been shown time and time again to be susceptible to manipulation.

P. Bunyan:

"legislation to restore integrity to our voting procedures"

Like requiring photo I.D.? No, the leftists oppose that vehemently. It'd be too difficult to cheat if they did that.

I wonder how the voting on this proposed legislation actually breaks down... I wonder if Republicans are actually blocking it... And if so I wonder why...

j stewart:

Larkin prefers optical scanning systems. They provide an indisputable paper trail. NOOOOO! Paper, yes. Secure, no. Optical scanning systems tally up the votes inside the computer, then upload the tallied votes to the mother-ship. The paper ballot offers recount capabilities. But if the computer chooses to not count your vote or to count it for the wrong guy, no one is the wiser. Unless the ballots are counted by hand. See "A Margin of Error Ballots of Straw" for a fictionalized accounting of what actually occurred in Florida during the 2006 election.


Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Advertisments

Categories

Archives

Technorati



Add to Technorati Favorites

Credits

Publisher: Kevin Aylward

Editors: Lee Ward, Larkin, Paul S Hooson, and Steve Crickmore

All original content copyright © 2007 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark. Wizbang Blue™ is a trademark of Wizbang®, LLC.

Powered by Movable Type 3.35

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.