« Hillary Thinks we Ought to go Back to Bill Clinton's Foreign Policy. Obama Doesn't. | Main | In Iraq if you Can't Beat Them Recruit Them »

Religious Right Places Teens at HIV Risk

Placing young adults at a greater risk for HIV is an unintended consequence that the religious right is unwilling to acknowledge, but it's a fact. They oppose sex education that promotes safe sex practices, such as the use of condoms, in favor of abstinence-only education that has been shown actually provides mis-information about safe sex practices. They've successfully lobbied the White House to continue these programs, and those efforts are ineffective at stopping HIV transmission among the targeted group.

Now there is yet another study out, this time in the U.K., showing that abstinence-only education programs are ineffective. The study shows that in high income countries like the United States, abstinence-only programs do not reduce the risk of HIV infection.

Sex abstinence programmes do not stop risky sexual behaviour or help in the prevention of unwanted pregnancy, a research team has concluded.

The Oxford University team reviewed 13 US trials involving over 15,000 people aged 10 to 21.

They found abstinence programmes had no negative or positive impact on the rates of sex infections or unprotected sex, the British Medical Journal said.

Abstinence-only sex ed was quietly passed into law, without hearings or floor votes in Congress, back in 1982 during the Reagan administration. From 1996 to 2006 Congress funneled over $1.5 Billion in state and federal matching funds to promote abstinence-only sex education. Currently Bush's budgeting has one-third of the HIV prevention monies allocated to abstinence-only sex education programs.

Today's news isn't new information. Numerous studies over the years have shows that abstinence-only sex education definitely keeps young adults at risk, but the religious right cares more about their moral agenda than they do about the lives of these young adults.

  • A 2003 Pennsylvania study found "taken as a whole, this initiative was largely ineffective in reducing sexual onset and promoting attitudes and skills consistent with sexual abstinence."
  • A 2004 Texas study found that before participating in an abstinence-only-until-marriage program, 23% of ninth grade girls had engaged in sexual intercourse. Following the program, 29% of the same age group reported having engaged in sexual intercourse. In addition, tenth grade boys reporting sexual intercourse increased from 24% to 39% following abstinence-only-until-marriage instruction.

    One of the study's investigators said, "we didn't see any strong indications these programs were having an impact in the direction desired...these programs seem to be much more concerned about politics than kids, and we need to get over that."

  • An Arizona report released in 2003 found "sexual behavior rates do not appear to be changing" as a result of the program. Despite claiming some success with short-term outcomes and "abstinence success rate" among virgins, the study concludes that "abstinence-only programs work best for sexually inexperienced youth" and that young people's "intent to pursue abstinence...showed significant decline from post-test to follow-up."

As this table shows, time after time the studies show that abstinence-only education's effectiveness drops measurably once the program ends, leaving the participants with the same degree of HIV risk as those people who received no sex education, proving the long-term ineffectiveness.

Bottom line: Applying resources into these programs instead of safe sex education is inneffective at reducing the HIV risk among the target population.


Note: Wizbang Blue is now closed and our authors have moved on. Paul Hooson can now be found at Wizbang Pop!. Please come see him there!

  • Currently 3/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 3/5 (10 votes cast)


Comments (3)

FMK:

I know this is a lost cause, but you really should develop some critical reading skills.

Your lead sentence;

"Placing young adults at a greater risk for HIV is an unintended consequence that the religious right is unwilling to acknowledge, but it's a fact."

The conclusion of your block quote;

"They found abstinence programmes had no negative or positive impact on the rates of sex infections or unprotected sex, the British Medical Journal said."

Lee Ward:

That would be fine, if only you would take a critical thinking class, MFK.

Since the education program is ineffective at reducing the rate of unprotected sex, it leaves them at risk of HIV.

Here's the post headline and lead paragraph again:

Religious Right Places Teens at HIV Risk

Placing young adults at a greater risk for HIV is an unintended consequence that the religious right is unwilling to acknowledge, but it's a fact. They oppose sex education that promotes safe sex practices, such as the use of condoms, in favor of abstinence-only education that has been shown actually provides mis-information about safe sex practices. They're successfully lobbied the White House to continue these programs, and those efforts are ineffective at stopping HIV transmission among the targeted group.

If one-third of the president's HIV-fighting budget is being used for programs which are ineffective at preventing HIV - instead of spending the money on more effective safe-sex education, leaving them at risk is indeed an unintended, but very real, consequence.

Or perhaps the religious right feels that a teen that ignores the abstinence education, becomes active, and contracts HIV is being punished (perhaps rightfully so?) for -- hmm, being a normal teenager instead of a good Christian teenager?

The Religious Right far exceeds the Biblical examples set for responsible sexual conduct on nearly every issue involving sex. Their open warfare against the Gay community for example, often rises to the level of pure hate organization conduct and is a disgrace to God. And on numerous other issues involving sexuality, their extremist views often lack the common sense and good advice for responsible conduct regarding sexuality found in the Biblical examples and Scriptures.

The Religious Right fails to understand that one walks in serious spiritual error when you add to the Scriptures just as sure as those that take away from those Scriptures.


Advertisments

Categories

Archives

Technorati



Add to Technorati Favorites

Credits

Publisher: Kevin Aylward

Editors: Lee Ward, Larkin, Paul S Hooson, and Steve Crickmore

All original content copyright © 2007 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark. Wizbang Blue™ is a trademark of Wizbang®, LLC.

Powered by Movable Type 3.35

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.