You don't have to wear a cowboy hat to demonstrate the ability to grab a bull by the horns and wrestle it to the ground.
11:19 AM |
0 comments
Iran wants to prove to the world community that it is continuing to take a hard line on the nuclear issue with the reported Saturday hanging of a telecoms salesman Ali Ashtari, 45, who the state claims was paid $50,000USD...
11:00 AM |
0 comments
It didn't take long for the recently moved NBA franchise to fire its first ever coach. The Oklahoma City Thunder, off to a league-worst 1-12 start in their new home...
10:07 AM |
0 comments
The Louisiana Governor just went to that state for its beautiful weather this time of year. From WWL-TV- Gov. Bobby Jindal traveled Friday to Iowa, a state that is pivotal...
9:18 AM |
17 comments
Being a lifelong Democrat I'm instinctively leery when corporations come knocking at my door bearing gifts, but on the surface at least this seems like an encouraging "change" from the patterns and historic attitude of health care insurers. (h/t U.S....
1:39 AM |
4 comments
Attorney General designate, Eric Holder, sends a cold chill up the spines of many civil libertarians and those that value separation of church and state with a history of disturbing statements and pandering to religious right organizations such as Morality...
8:22 PM |
7 comments
Today at the ADT is causing a stir. Ron Sirak wrote about it. Steve Elling had the following to say. "I'm serious and I was tested two weeks ago, so...
8:02 PM |
2 comments
The news out of the LPGA event in West Palm Beach isn't who made the 36 hole cut or Annika Sorenstam having to take a drug test after play ended...
6:20 PM |
0 comments
That best describes the cats game against New Jersey last night. Florida out shot 24-19 but lost 3-1. Simple problem with the game- Florida let New Jersey control it. Some...
6:14 PM |
0 comments
His back to back seventies at a tournament in Hong Kong advance him to weekend play. A Hong Kong teenager became the youngest player ever to make the cut at...
5:21 PM |
0 comments
Comments (13)
Dork,
How do you suggest they handle the Flag? AS soon as he landed, the crew was there to pick it up.
The whole clip was impressive, yet you seem to focus on 10 seconds that highlight your duplicity.
I don't disagree with the assessment that Blackwater lacks the discipline of our military, but the tape shows patriotism and support of our military.
1. Posted by Dennis P. Skea | December 9, 2007 1:34 PM
Posted on December 9, 2007 13:34
Not to say that wasn't what happened, but portraying an incident as happening last week when the rolling credits says "USAA Fleet Week October 21, 2006".
And yes SD Politico portrays it that way, too.
Blackwater may be the veritable Spawn of Satan, but that is not an excuse for this shoddy, disingenuous tripe. (FWIW, I have seen the Navy's Leaping Frogs (SEALs) do the same stunt.
http://www.leapfrogs.navy.mil/gallery/Large/High08.jpg
2. Posted by MunDane | December 9, 2007 5:28 PM
Posted on December 9, 2007 17:28
Larkin:
I'm going to be about as kind as I can be about this: You're a friggin' moron and a malicious liar and distorter.
12 seconds into the tape it clearly says 'USAA Fleet Week Football Classic, October 21, 2006. A game Air Force beat SDSU, 19-12.
That's right, 2006. MANY months BEFORE the Blackwater scandal. Not "lask week" (your typo, not mine).
But your asshattery doesn't stop there: You accuse the parachutist, who may or may not be someone from Blackwater but whose chute does have the Blackwater logo, of purposefully dragging the flag--as if he had any other physics-based choice in doing so upon landing! I suppose you'd like the parachutist to fly that large flag off his back and perhaps get it entangle it with his chute and plummeting to earth. Hmm? Is that what you want? Do you also know this has been done by numerous times before? Nah, probably not. This doesn't make you stupid, just moronically ignorant.
Of course, your lackluster powers of perception are full regalia when you fail to note how 2 sailors immediately rush in toward the flag after the landing...and NOT to the parachuter!
Whatever your issues you have with Blackwater that's fine. But don't be an asshole and attempt to portray something that IN NO WAY SHAPE OR FORM is purposefully desecrating the flag.
This 'story" has ZERO credibility, pal. ZERO.
3. Posted by Peter F. | December 9, 2007 7:18 PM
Posted on December 9, 2007 19:18
Knock off the abusive language, Peter.
4. Posted by Lee Ward | December 10, 2007 10:23 AM
Posted on December 10, 2007 10:23
It's justified, Lee. Don't even try and defend this garbage.
5. Posted by Peter F. | December 10, 2007 12:59 PM
Posted on December 10, 2007 12:59
Larkin:
This has very little to do with a simple typo. You attempted to portray this alleged desecration of the flag as a purposeful and malicious by Blackwater. (Yes, "alleged" dragging of the flag. Go to YouTube, type in "parachuting with American flag", and you'll see others, including military paratroopers, "dragging" the flag upon landing. And what happens the instant they land? Other military personnel/citizens immediately rush in to pick up and secure the flag.)
What's most appalling is your sheer and transparent laziness is using footage from last year to support and further demonize Blackwater in your "argument".
6. Posted by Peter F. | December 10, 2007 4:58 PM
Posted on December 10, 2007 16:58
You know, that typo would have been avoided by watching the video...
7. Posted by MunDane | December 10, 2007 9:30 PM
Posted on December 10, 2007 21:30
Whether it happened in 2006 or 2007 is 100% absolutely, totally irrelevant. You guys keep dodging the point to throw up these trollish roadblocks about the date of the video, all the while avoiding the pertinent questions.
Why aren't you addressing the fact that it was fleet week and Blackhawk is not part of the military?
Larkin said: "I certainly think a video from 2006 is relevant since it appropriately demonstrates how Blackwater is trying to blur the lines between themselves and our military."
8. Posted by Lee Ward | December 10, 2007 10:21 PM
Posted on December 10, 2007 22:21
Why aren't you addressing the fact that it was fleet week and Blackhawk is not part of the military?
OK, here's my answer:
So what if Blackwater represents themselves as a sponsor at Fleet Week. I'll bet the farm they sure they weren't the only gov't contractor who represented themselves as such.
Boeing, Lockheed, General Motors etc. are vital military resources and contractors that represent themselves and have been sponsors during Fleet Week/Seafair here in Seattle for years. Nobody accuses them of "trying to blur the lines between themselves and our military." (Newsflash: it takes money to hold events like Fleet Weeks, money that usually comes from sponsors like Boeing, Lockheed and, yes, even Blackwater.)
By Larkin's logic (if you can call it that), ANY private company that represents themselves at a Fleet Week event, and that's not a branch of the military, can be seen as blurring "the lines between themselves and our military." (Example: If the chute had a Macy's logo on it, Larkin could make the same craptastic argument that they are "pretending to be part of our military.") Huh?
Larkin's attempt at connecting the two would be laughable if he weren't so serious. (Amend that: it's still laughable, just in a more pathetic, tinfoil hat kinda way.)
9. Posted by Peter F. | December 12, 2007 5:21 PM
Posted on December 12, 2007 17:21
It's not about sponsorship either, Peter. BUt if we can keep this up, knocking down your straswman arguments, we may finanlly get you to the issue at hand.
As a refresher this is quoted from Larkin's post:
Blackwater DID do the jump again this December. It's unfortunate that the video provided was of the 2006 Blackwater jump, but it happened again in 2007.
As you can see from the above, Larkin is not talking about Blackwater being a sponsor - he's pointing out the absolute lunacy of having Blackwater acts a military agent in these festivities.
Blackwater is a corporation, not an arm of the US military. Blackwater has no business participating in these events, and as Larkin points out to do is is blurring the lines between official and unofficial agents.
10. Posted by Lee Ward | December 12, 2007 6:12 PM
Posted on December 12, 2007 18:12
Strawman? LOL. Do you even KNOW what a strawman argument is, Lee? What I'm doing here is bringing up a point that is obviously not being considered: they were a sponsor in some capacity. After doing a little digging it turns out...
Did you know that this was part of the half-time program of the game and that the parachutist was part of Blackwater's precision parachuting team, and that the act was meant to honor veterans? This was the 3rd year in a row they've done so. (Some argue that companies like Blackwater undermine military efforts and dishonor the flag, etc., an argument I don't buy.) But basically, somebody asked the folks at Blackwater to participate (aka: supply the jumpers and sponsor the jump).
And this somehow "blurs" the line in the public's eye? How exactly?
But to your point...
The military and security firms like Blackwater work as partners in theater. The two share intel and tactics for safety and security purposes. For example, Blackwater was responsible for Paul Bremer's and Ryan Crocker's security in Iraq. Blackwater will turn to the military for intel on "hot spots", routes to take/avoid and will in turn report back to the military on any trouble it encounters. The simple fact of the matter is that the our military can't take on these types of duties, so the work has to be contracted out.
So, yes, the line between private security firms and the military is indeed blurred, but for good reason: to protect and save lives.
Question: Don't you think the military, if it had a problem with Blackwater, would allow them at event like Fleet Week? I already know the answer....
11. Posted by Peter F. | December 12, 2007 7:48 PM
Posted on December 12, 2007 19:48
"Did you know that this was part of the half-time program of the game and that the parachutist was part of Blackwater's precision parachuting team, and that the act was meant to honor veterans?"
Irrelevant to the post and just another strawman argument.
Did Grumman parachute down? No. Did Lockheed? No - Why did a Blackwater employee parachute down?
Because the line between military and contractor is being blurred - and who do Blackwater employees answer to? Our commander in chief? No.
They have no business taking part in "Fleet Week" where we honor our military.
Next you'll be telling us that Blackwater employees should participate and be honored on Memorial Day, and receive Vet benefits.
You neocons are sick puppies, Peter - but at least in your case you acknowledge your illness.
"So, yes, the line between private security firms and the military is indeed blurred, but for good reason: to protect and save lives."
Yeah, having Blackwater parachute into the stadium saved lives...
"Question: Don't you think the military, if it had a problem with Blackwater, would allow them at event like Fleet Week? I already know the answer...."
Nope - this is being pushed on us by the administration, not by the military leaders, Peter. Wake up and smell the profits.
12. Posted by Lee Ward | December 12, 2007 9:23 PM
Posted on December 12, 2007 21:23
Next you'll be telling us that Blackwater employees should participate and be honored on Memorial Day, and receive Vet benefits.
Now THAT is a strawman!
Why did a Blackwater employee parachute down?
Do you have a hard time paying attention?
"But basically, somebody asked the folks at Blackwater to participate (aka: supply the jumpers and sponsor the jump)."
They don't just barge their way into an event, Lee. There event coordinators at stadiums and they orchestrate stunts like this. Common practice.
Yeah, having Blackwater parachute into the stadium saved lives...
You REALLY need to look up the definition of what a strawman argument is. Your ability at recognizing one is sorely lacking. This, what you just said, IS a strawman wisecrack by you and completely fails to address the relationship between Blackwater and the military addressing.
Nope - this is being pushed on us by the administration, not by the military leaders...
Oh dear God. That doesn't even come close to answering the question. Even a braindead dog knows that ANY administration wouldn't have the time or could even be bothered with such a infinitely small request as being allowed to jump into a half-time show.
13. Posted by Peter F. | December 13, 2007 5:02 PM
Posted on December 13, 2007 17:02