Thanks for the backlink, folks! He's threatening to sue me now, too, for slander. My lawyer has offered to represent me for free, so here's hoping he does!

Isn't this the sort of story that Larry Flynt, publisher of Hustler if confirmed, pays a million dollars for? And what would end this story or keep it alive is for someone to talk to some of Larry Sinclair's friends, neighbours and relatives and find out what type of person this guy is. As I suspect it will be the description of someone who likes to invent stories or is very vulnerable to being persuaded that something did happen like those people who give first person accounts of being involved in alien abductions.

The above reporting is outrageous, slanderous and something to promote false gossip and speculation about Senator Obama. If that is the only way they can win, it is pretty telling what kind of people would be in the Whitehouse who could stoop to spreading lies for their own personal gain. There are plenty of stories about Pres. Clinton and his sex escapades and some of Sen Clinton which I will not stoop to go into because unsubstantiated and I will not try to slander someone's good name for political gain for someone else. I hope Sen. Obama finds out who paid this man to slander him in this way. And if it is the Clintons, I don't think they want to Go There!

If this person reside in a skill nursing facility due to his disability then it appeared that this individual could have another condition why he is in the SNF. He appeared he can able to do his ADLs and capacity to create such things and because of that more likely he has other physical and mental conditions that qualified him to be in that environment. Government subsidized care required substantiated medical conditions in order to qualify. The question is, if he is disable, then how long he has been that way? Is it congenital or due to other reasons such as car accident? There are thousands of questions why he is in this facility and that alone raises the validity of his case.

Sinclair answered that question in one of the interviews, stating that he has a non-congenital, physical disability only.

Perhaps questions about his disability will be included in the poiygraph test.

I am hoping also that the test will include her past mental condition. People should also take in consideration that this type of test is not exactly 100%. People with extreme neurophysical superiority can possibly beat this mode of testing. Whoeve is paying for this test, they should also consider asking Sinclair permission (in writing) to research his past medical records. Mind you, even childhood past medical conditions will indicate something. They should not rely on this test. They have to dig deeper. If they don't, the other party will. The irony of this, the family and relatives of this individual will be exposed to scrutiny in order to excavate the "other" possibilities.

How do you know Sinclair's not telling the truth? He's got specific dates and places -- should be easy for a few MSM journalists to take a few days and ask the right questions.

If Obama used crack in 1999, then that's it for him. Do you even want to know? Most Obama fans probably don't.

Specific dates and places could be all connected into a possible story. In order to sensetionalized a "Me" story, I myself sometimes could do that specially if you are going back to an almost ten years old scenario. The most odd of this story, this individual came up with this recent allegation and elected not to expose this story when the senator became famous right after the 2004 democratic convention or even right after the release of his famous books. This individual could not have the ability to predict that he is running for president unless he is a gifted fortune teller. The disparity of sequence of events will even induce question in the minds and intelligence of common people and that including me.
Alright, enough with this. I have laundry and cooking to do.

Look He may have smoked the crack and thats bad enough. But getting his pole smoked by a dude when he got a hottie like Michele at home. Sorry I highly doubt it and I don't really like him.

I smoked crack and engaged in a three-way just last week with Obama and Clinton. Will someone pay me $20K to take a polygraph?

And relax, bacaangel, the reason this is Obama is because no one would pay anything for Clinton, they would all just assume it was true. This guy is as much an agent of the Clinton campaign as that nut heckler in Ohio the other day...

was an agent of the Obama campaign!

I listened to the Larry Sinclair interview from yesterday at blogtalkradio. The strangest thing he said was; he's not going to release any physical or factual evidence (like receipts, etc) because of how the story is being twisted by the blogosphere.

This is the first indication to me that he is crazy and might be lying. His not releasing anything factual is WHY there is speculation. He could stop all the chaotic speculation, and probably the threats, by revealing the very information he doesn't want to.

That's crazy.
He could've said it is being litigated or something else that would've made sense. Now it just smacks of being made up with no physical proof.

Now it just smacks of being made up with no physical proof.

It always did. The guy's looking for attention, and he'll string people along as long as they give it to him.

Suckers.

"he's not going to release any physical or factual evidence (like receipts, etc) because of how the story is being twisted by the blogosphere."

Sinclair has stated that he lots of physical proof (credit card receipts, and I'm not sure what else) that he is willing to turn over to reporters. In the interview he said he's not willing to turn it over to bloggers because of how the story is being twisted by bloggers, etc.

Physical proofs after almost 10 years and pursue this issue now that he is running for president, that is very incovenient. There's also that possibility that in some degree, a pocket of white people will never accept a black person to be their leader. I came acrossed few insulting and degrading blogs referenced to what I just mentioned.

A polygraph test is highly reliable but not admissible as evidence in court. If they were unreliable cops wouldn't ask spouses of homicide victims to take them to rule them out as suspects. If the guy takes the test and passes next Tuesday I will believe him especially if Obama refuses to take one to prove his innocence. If he proves to be a liar he should be taken out and shot after we waterboard him to find out who really put him up to it.

,,,after we waterboard him to find out who really put him up to it.

I like the way you think, Dave. I don't believe that anyone put him up to it, however. The downside is too great if it was traced back to them.

It is mighty funny how all this came to light now! But if it is true I wud have to think long and hard about voting for Hillary with all the Clintons shady past and and failures and disappointing behavior during B. Clintons days as our supposed leader! I certainly would not vote for this Mcain character. I think all this reafirms alot of peoples beliefs you can't trust politicians! I vote 4 no one!

I am not saying whether I believe these allegations or true or not. I did want to point out that while Gateway Towers does include a senior center (154 rooms)the towers also have apartments for rent.

http://www.mzr.com/edu/comm/rentals.htm

http://duluth.minnesotawebpage.com/communityinfo/view/Apartments/

Well wat ya kno doesn't matter what scandal is out there,the American people still want obama over Hilarious or the control freak Mcain.

Gee, let's ask Tucker Carlson and John Fund - hardly standard-bearers for the liberal media - since they were both falsely acccused of sexual improriety by two DIFFERENT crazy people. Look it up.

Type in either one of their names and the word "rape" into Google and you'll see it for yourself.

Any loon can make a charge against someone.

As Carlson said, it used to be that when a sex scandal broke, if the actual charge wasn't true, at least something was - the candidate or person accused did something sexual.

Then he was accused of rape in Louisville by some woman. He spent thousands of dollars not only proving he wasn't there at the time of the alleged rape - but also that he had never been to Louisville in this entire life!!!!

Perhaps the standard of accuracy in a major media-story should be a little higher than a self-recorded You Tube video, a self-respresented case filed in Federal Court (which would accept my lawsuit against the moon for shining too bright - if I had the filing fee) and interviews by people who's blogs make Oliver Stone movies look like recorded bits of actual history.

Come on!

So what now Larry Sinclair? Results are in...see whitehouse.com.

Pathetic liar!

I believe Sinclair. The more I see Obama the more I see how he is somewhat effeminate. Makes sense, his wife strikes me as a ball buster. There are a lot more black men invloved in the "down low" than most people would think. These guys don't see themselves as gay, they just think they're cool. Like these black guys you see with ear rings on both ears.

I HAVE ALWAYS HEARD "WHERE THERE IS SMOKE THERE
IS FIRE". IF THERE IS NO TRUTH TO THIS STORY,
WHY DO WE NOT HEAR FROM THE MEDIA? THE ANSWER-
REPUBLICANS WANT HIM FOR THE DEMOCRAT NOMINEE
BECAUSE THEY DON'T WANT TO GO UP AGAINST HILLARY BECAUSE SHE WOULD BEAT MCCAIN, OBAMA
WON'T.YES!!! I BELEIVE THE STORY. ARE ANY OF THE NEWS MEDIA MAN (WOMAN) ENOUGH TO REPORT ON
THIS---- I THINK NOT,BUT THE AMERICAN PEOPLE
DESERVE TO KNOW--- TRUE OR FALSE, SOMEONE IS
KEEPING IT HUSH-HUSH. ARE THEY AFRID?

The media has a pretty crumby record these days of reporting fully on the issues and matters that ARE real.

and now that Sinclair's polygraph shows that he wasn't truthful, you expect them to report that?

Why?

teresa--
...and YOU know these things are factual about "black men" HOW?...

Hillary Clinton is behind all of this. It's been nothing but dirt and lies since the day she realized America is not interested in being led by a spineless witch.

How is this different from the bogus letter that Dan Rather reported on about President Bush? The answer - The liberal media is not jumping all over this even though there is no evidance.

I also like the bit about Obama's camp blaming Clinton. He probably thinks that the Hillary is in charge of everything evil. Next the Obamanation will say that Hillary is charge of the VRWC.

Did he ever take the test? What happened?

He failed two lie detector tests but made lots of money! This clearly a put up job, he's rehearsed and not even remotely believable. Someone is hoping to put doubts about Obamas drug use at a crucial time in the primaries. I have my own suspicions but it's interesting the BJ was included in the story