« Lobbyist Boasts about Conducting Business on McCain's Straight Talk Express | Main | John McCain's Lobbyist Problem »

Nader Launches Third Party Bid for Presidency

nader.jpgHe's back in his fifth try (1992, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008)

Consumer advocate Ralph Nader said on Sunday that he is launching another long shot independent campaign for president of the United States.

Nader, who will turn 74 this week, announced his presidential bid on NBC's "Meet the Press" saying that neither the Democrats nor the Republicans are addressing the problems facing Americans.

Nader also ran for president in 2000 when he got about 2.7 percent of the national vote as the Green Party candidate and played a role in deciding the final presidential outcome. He also ran as an independent in 2004 and got only a tiny fraction of the vote.

Many Democrats blame Nader's participation in the close race between Democrat Al Gore and Republican George Bush in 2000 for tipping the election in favor of Bush. They believe that but for Nader's name on the ballot in Florida, Gore would have been the clear winner and president today instead of Bush.

Nader called Washington "corporate occupied territory" that turns the government against the interest of its own people.

"In that context I have decided to run for president," Nader said.

In the 2000 Presidential race Nader received 2,883,105 votes, or 2.74% of the total popular vote, but his biggest impact on the outcome of the election was in Florida.

While few of those who supported Nader back in 2000 will admit to the 'spoiling' effect their votes had on the course of history in this country, in retrospect and under impartial analysis, it is absolutely undeniable that were it not for their votes being cast for Nader in Florida, Al Gore would have won Florida and this country would be in a much different, better place than it is now.

It'll be interesting to see the effect, if any, that Nader has on the Democratic party today. The far-left radicals I know are firmly in Obama's camp, and they are extremely unlikely to abandon Obama in favor of Nader, but could possibly move to Nader if Clinton were to receive the nomination.

And one of Nader's strongholds in his past bids were young voters, who today clearly have caught Obama fever, but again -- if Clinton were nominated the fact that Barack Obama has done such an excellent job of alienating young voters against Clinton would probably cause young voters to migrate to Nader.

Obama's past 'slash and burn' tactics against the Democratic Party 'establishment' plays to Nader's advantage if Obama is not on the Democratic ticket..

This far away it's hard to see how Nader's candidacy will have a significant impact on the 2008 outcome if Obama is the Democratic nominee, but I can see a measurable and perhaps significant effect on the final outcome if Clinton prevails.

Downside aside... it is hard to see how this will benefit the Democrats in any way, and you can bet the GOP will do everything they can to create wedge issues to drive Democrats away from our candidate and towards Nader, so it is natural at this point to feel some angst over this development given the history of Nader's effect on past elections.

But keep in mind things are still somewhat unsettled on the Republican side of the fence, and a third party bid there is not out of the question, and could have an balancing, equalizing effect by pulling votes away from McCain.

Update: Obama and Clinton spokespersons are (of course) not voicing any concerns:

"I think it's a non-event,'' said Arizona Gov. Jane Napolitano, a Democrat supporting Sen. Barack Obama's campaign for president, in an appearance today on CBS News' Face the Nation. "They aren't looking for a third-party candidate.''

Michigan Gov. Jennifer Granholm, a Democrat supporting Sen. Hillary Clinton's campaign for president, agreed that Nader's decision is "a non-event.''

"There is unhappiness in the electorate, and (Texas Republican Rep.) Ron Paul's bid captures that anger,'' Geer said. "But Ralph Nader is not the vehicle for the expression of this discontent. Nader was a spoiler in 2000 and will long be remembered for that. But when he ran in 2004, few cared.

Related: The Boston.com website has a feature showing the history of third-party bids.


Note: Wizbang Blue is now closed and our authors have moved on. Paul Hooson can now be found at Wizbang Pop!. Please come see him there!

  • Currently 2.8/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 2.8/5 (11 votes cast)


Comments (3)

Jennifer:

Nadar can be a pain at times. However, he may have a positive effect on the campaign by asking the really tough questions the candidates need to answer for voters that the media don't ask. Sometimes the media is just too busy with other priorities like looking for what affairs the candidates have had and other sensational news. He will also ask ALL the candidates-this includes Mr. Obama who the media appear to be less hard on, compared to the other candidates.

Steve Crickmore:

In 2004, Nader received only 463,653 votes for 0.38% of the popular vote, running on both the Reform Pary label in some states and as an Independent in other states; he managed to get on the ballot in 34 states. What do you suppose he will do this election campaign that he couldn't do when he annoounced had zero influence in 2004 his 'nadir' moment up until now? If he really was interested in third party influence he would try and build some grass roots organization between elections but that would selfless work and putting his ego in check.

Lee Ward[TypeKey Profile Page]:

Jennifer is right, throwing his propeller cap into the ring means Nader gets a soapbox from which he can lob mud at the remaining candidates.

He must know he has zero-point-zero chance of winning the election.


Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

bluetips@wizbangblog.com

Advertisments

Categories

Archives

Technorati



Add to Technorati Favorites

Credits

Publisher: Kevin Aylward

Editors: Lee Ward, Larkin, Paul S Hooson, and Steve Crickmore

All original content copyright © 2007 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark. Wizbang Blue™ is a trademark of Wizbang®, LLC.

Powered by Movable Type 3.35

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.