« Clinton Going Forward | Main | McCain and Letterman Trade Barbs »

Obama Should Stick to Speeches and Not Issues

Barack Obama has openly changed his style of late, eschewing his usual highfaluting oratory for some down-home straight talk of his own in Pennsylvania, now favoring Townhall gatherings to packing the stadiums as he has for his big tent revival meetings of the past.

Now we can see the danger of Barack Obama actually talking about the issues. Bottom-line - he sucks at it.

First, Obama knows and acknowledges that John McCain's statement about staying in Iraq for the next 100 years relates to maintaining a Korea-like peacekeeping-monitoring presence. For example:

Question: "But I think that [Sen. McCain] talks about it in the spirit of Germany and Japan..."

Obama: "And we've been in South Korea for 50 years. And he's used that as an example..."

and

At the end of the exchange Obama admitted that he understands McCain is talking about the Korean style bases and not a hot war like Iraq, "Well we've been in South Korea for 50 years and he's used that as an example as George Bush has and that is decades and we're spending 10 billion dollars a month in Iraq right now.

We're not spending 10 billion dollars a month in Korea, so Obama's argument is specious, and amateursville, if not out-right laughable.

But Mighty Mouth Obama marches on...

...[R]ather than sticking to an airtight retelling of McCain's words, Obama deviated from McCain's comment on more than one occasion.

This is how Obama characterized McCain's position during a Feb. 9th town-hall meeting in Bangor, Maine: "And when it comes to foreign policy, John McCain says he wants to fight a hundred-year war, a hundred years he says, as long as it takes. That is not designed to make us safe that is simply stubbornness. That is designed to try to make a bad decision look better." LINK

More examples of Obama distorting the truth.

"When it comes to foreign policy, John McCain says he wants to fight a 100-year war--a hundred years, as long as it takes," channeling outrage from the crowd.

"That is not designed to make us safer," he continued, shifting the crowd to cheers. "That is simply stubbornness. That is designed to try to make a bad decision look better."

That isn't what McCain said at all, and it's so simple to put together the facts, side-by-side, and show that Obama is being a loud-mouthed fool and not addressing the facts.

It's clear, and becoming more painfully obvious day-by-day, as to why Barack Obama has avoided a toe-to-toe battle on the issues with Clinton, relying instead on 10,000 people roaring their approval in stadiums.

When it comes to Obama what you get is a religion, a cult-following of supporters, relying on distortion and in some cases out-right lies to move the agenda forward.

And now Barack Oabama has decided to address the issues. God help us Democrats...


Note: Wizbang Blue is now closed and our authors have moved on. Paul Hooson can now be found at Wizbang Pop!. Please come see him there!

  • Currently 3/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 3/5 (6 votes cast)


Comments (2)

AJ:

Jerry Zeifman, a lifelong Democrat, supervised the work of 27-year-old Hillary Rodham on the committee. Hillary got a job working on the investigation at the behest of her former law professor, Burke Marshall, who was also Sen. Ted Kennedy's chief counsel in the Chappaquiddick affair. When the investigation was over, Zeifman fired Hillary from the committee staff and refused to give her a letter of recommendation - one of only three people who earned that dubious distinction in Zeifman's 17-year career.

Why?

"Because she was a liar," Zeifman said in an interview last week. "She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality."

(from wizbang)

Your candidate isn't much better than Obama, Lee.

Oh, yeah, Zeifman.

Heh.

The same guy who accused John Doar, the Chief Counsel for the House Judiciary Committee who won approval of several articles of impeachment against Nixon, of "sabotaging the process?"

The same guy who filed an accusation of "war crimes" against Bill Clinton and Warren Christopher for their intervention in Bosnia?

Nut case. Blithering, raving moron. So radical he might even make Obama's preacher wince.

Yeah, there's a credible source for you . . .


Contact

Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]

Advertisments

Categories

Archives

Technorati



Add to Technorati Favorites

Credits

Publisher: Kevin Aylward

Editors: Lee Ward, Larkin, Paul S Hooson, and Steve Crickmore

All original content copyright © 2007 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark. Wizbang Blue™ is a trademark of Wizbang®, LLC.

Powered by Movable Type 3.35

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.