« DNC Gets Creative on Fundraising | Main | Removing GOP from Power in Congress »

Edwards Endorses Obama

It's about time Edwards made this call:

Former Sen. John Edwards is endorsing Sen. Barack Obama's presidential candidacy Wednesday evening, in a dramatic attempt by the Obama campaign to answer concerns regarding Obama's appeal to working-class voters, several senior Democratic sources tell ABC News.

It's good timing - Obama needs this boost at this juncture - he's very close to closing on the nomination.

If I recall correctly, Edwards has already indicated that he doesn't want the VP slot - and those kind of statements aren't worth squat in politics. If offered, I suspect he'd accept - and this endorsement should get the rumor mill going.

Reaction from the Clinton camp (same link as above):

Edwards and his wife had publicly praised Clinton's healthcare plan, but Edwards' anti-corporate message seemed a better fit for Obama's outsider campaign.

Campaign Chairman Terry McAuliffe responded to the endorsement this evening both during a quick press availability outside of the Senator's residence, and in a paper statement.

"We respect John Edwards," McAuliffe said, "but as the voters of West Virginia showed last night, this thing is far from over."

A source close to the Clinton campaign said the Edwards camp gave the Clinton folks a heads up.

"Clearly it's upsetting," the source tells ABC. "He brings the workers" to Obama.

"Well I don't think it's good news, but there's a lot of news in this business and we move forward and move past it. It's not great news," a Clinton senior advisor said.

Asked what effect the Edwards endorsement might have, he said: "We don't know. We'll see. We'll see how much of it is transferable," referring to Edwards' popularity with white working class voters.

"We would've preferred it," to be our endorsement the advisor said. That's not a secret.

Clinton met today with six uncommitted superdelegates at the DCCC offices on Capitol Hill.

This advisor said the Clinton campaign believes superdelegates are concerned about Obama's loss in West Virginia last night and other swing states.

"No question -- that started with Ohio and increased with Pennsylvania, Indiana and West Virginia," he said. "All I can say is, I don't want to overdramatize it, but starting with Ohio the remaining superdelegates started really focusing on the 270 electoral vote issue and how do we best assemble that and it's made a marked impression."

But then in a moment of candor the advisor conceded, "I'm not sure it's gonna be enough."

Update: Obama and Edwards are trying their best to kill the buzz for Clinton as she comes off Tuesday's 41 point romp over Obama in West Virginia - meanwhile the following bit of conjecture may explain why Edwards didn't go the distance in his bid for the nomination:

David "Mudcat" Saunders, a chief adviser for Edwards on rural affairs during the presidential campaign, said the endorsement should take some sting out of Obama's resounding loss in West Virginia.

"For Barack Obama, I think he ought to kiss Johnny Edwards on the lips to kill this 41-point loss," Saunders said.

I'm not so sure that's the best way to shore up Obama's sagging approval ratings in rural America.

Note: Wizbang Blue is now closed and our authors have moved on. Paul Hooson can now be found at Wizbang Pop!. Please come see him there!

  • Currently 3.1/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 3.1/5 (7 votes cast)

Comments (1)

One scenario, the fairest and best for the candidates and the party, has not been mentioned lately: redo the Fl & MI primaries. I voted for Obama in MA and still support him although my support is waning due to his stonewalling on FL & MI and his team's use of technicalities to hold onto the lead. It's clear to me after WV that Clinton, much as I dislike her, retains enough support to deserve a shot at the nomination. It is self-destructive for the Dems to deny MI & FL a vote. The correct penalty for cutting in line with the primaries is to go to the back of the line -- not to be denied a voice altogether -- it's just coincidence that this year the penalty makes the offenders even more influential -- that shouldn't change the correct approach. And Obama needs to win fair and square, no ducking contests, to stand tall as the nominee in November. Older women are deeply angered by the games being played to avoid a fair fight and they represent a huge democratic constituency with alot of money. The MI & FL primaries should take place in late June, giving the candidates adequate time to make their cases to the voters -- no quickies or seating based on past, flawed primaries, as Clinton would like. This would have the added benefit of keeping the nation focused on the Dems an extra month, denying McCain the spotlight. The primaries should be paid for in equal parts by the DNC, state democratic parties, and the Clinton and Obama campaigns. Better Git It In Your Soul -- the Dems are losing support to "straight talk McCain" over these shenanigans. Do the Right Thing -- do the primaries over and do them right!


Send e-mail tips to us:

[email protected]





Add to Technorati Favorites


Publisher: Kevin Aylward

Editors: Lee Ward, Larkin, Paul S Hooson, and Steve Crickmore

All original content copyright © 2007 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark. Wizbang Blue™ is a trademark of Wizbang®, LLC.

Powered by Movable Type 3.35

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.