« GM's Great Fuel Cell Powered Equinox That You May Never Own | Main | Michael Steele: Turning The Page Of The Same Old Book »

The Great Lear Steam Engine You Never Got To Own

The new Obama Administration's proposals for more fuel efficient automobiles that get a fleet average of 35 miles per gallon is certainly likely to create another technology development scramble in Detroit, Tokyo and Seoul to find new ways to get more miles out of the conventional automobile. However as early as the early 1990's some American companies sought alternative unique alternative technology engines.

In the early 1900's the Stanley Steamer cars were very powerful and fast cars, yet the high price tag of $2,200 compared to just $360 for a Ford Model T in 1907 helped to make these steamer cars a real rarity even in those days. Comic Jay Leno joked about he once got a ticket for going 75 mph on a 55mph stretch of a California freeway in a 1917 Stanley Steamer. Further the steam blowing out of the back of the vehicle was mistaken for fire by the police who called the fire department as well to put out the fire.

But William Lear, the aviation pioneer, was so impressed with the steam engine design that he had a dream during the late 1960's to bring back a modern version of the steam engine that featured a closed circuit design in which a special sort of fluid that would not freeze and would be encased in closed coils to power the engine. It also featured an external rather than internal combustion type design as well which was also unique to the engine design. One of my own relatives was also the lead engineer on this unique project to produce a new type of automobile engine that would produce up to 500hp and was hoped would only produce just 1% of the pollution of conventional internal combustion engines. WPL_steam.jpg

Lear spent millions of dollars to buy a former production plant and hire a group of talented engineers to work for several years on the development of this new modern steam form of combustion engine. At first, a larger model was built to power a bus and later a very small and compact version of the engine was developed that powered a Chevrolet Monte Carlo. The compact size was very impressive of the later engine.

The Lear engine was powerful and seemed to have some clear advantages over the old Stanley design including no steam exhaust due to the closed circuit design unlike the old style engines which blew lots of exhaust steam. However, it appeared that the engine just was not nearly as efficient as the normal internal combustion engines as well as it seemed to run best on kerosene rather than gasoline. Eventually Lear had to give up his dream of the steam engine. But the incredibly compact size of the engine had to be one of the most impressive features of the Lear steam engine. Perhaps it was a great idea that just needed to be developed a little more to be a greater technological success than it really was. On the official Lear website, the Lear family blames Detroit for a role in helping to bury the design as well, although they do not elaborate how Detroit actually did this. Regardless, the Lear steam engine dream eventually died as all but a few lead engineers slowly were laid off before the project was eventually shut down in Nevada.

Then William Lear turned to his love of electronics instead, and developed the Lear 8-track tape cartridge system which made music portable for cars. For a while this revolutionized the portability of music in automobiles before the cassette tapes were improved enough to replace the 8-track as the standard for portable music. Eventually the compact disc managed to displace both formats. But few persons remember that as far back as the late 50's a small number of companies marketed some novel small record players in cars designed to play a 45rpm single, or about three minutes of music, with skips and scratches when the car hit bumps in the road, etc.

Ironically, after losing millions of dollars on the failed steam engine dream, Lear turned his portable 8-track cartridge player dream into an $8 billion dollar industry by 1978 until cassette tapes began to quickly overtake the market and become the new dominant format. But William Lear's role as one of the greatest American inventors cannot be understated. The man was a genius.


Note: Wizbang Blue is now closed and our authors have moved on. Paul Hooson can now be found at Wizbang Pop!. Please come see him there!

  • Currently 2.3/5
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Rating: 2.3/5 (3 votes cast)


Comments (3)

MunDane68:

I remember reading about the research on this, one of the BIG problems with this engine was that the "Special Fluid" was a freon analogue, which in a fit of modesty was named "learium".

The system worked well, but it was prone to leakage in normal use, and imagine today with all the hair-pulling that goes on about ozone depleting chemicals today.

Doubting Thomas:

The man was a genius, all right. But - genius and practicality = big bucks. Genius w/o practicality = bankrupcy. And, unfortunately, what's 'practical' is often seen only in hindsight. The inventor's zeal can't be translated to real-world sales if the people who actually would use it won't buy it.

For a Silicon Valley analog, see the Osborne Computer Corp. Nice little CP/M machines, reasonably fast, portable, and affordable for the times. Osborne was selling everything he could make - and then announced they were going to make an IBM PC compatible one. Sales went to near-zero overnight, and the company had serious cash-flow problems before they could get the PC Compatibles out.

But at the time the standard was to announce product when it was still in the vaporware stage, to judge interest and see if there was a demand. All the Osborne money was tied up in producing the CP/M model, w/no resources left to finish R&D and get them into production. End result? Crash and burn for Osborne.

It doesn't matter how good YOU think the product is. If the customer won't buy it, you're SOL.

Paul Hooson:

Hello MunDane68 and Doubting Thomas, I'm sure some of the drawbacks of this engine were fairly serious enough to make Detroit back away from it. Selling something new like this always means some early version problems. Yet I sure admire it, maybe partly because one of my relatives, Larry, was the lead engineer on the project. It was a rather interesting bit of strange design. I'm glad the 8-tracks worked out better.


Advertisments

Categories

Archives

Technorati



Add to Technorati Favorites

Credits

Publisher: Kevin Aylward

Editors: Lee Ward, Larkin, Paul S Hooson, and Steve Crickmore

All original content copyright © 2007 by Wizbang®, LLC. All rights reserved. Wizbang® is a registered service mark. Wizbang Blue™ is a trademark of Wizbang®, LLC.

Powered by Movable Type 3.35

Hosting by ServInt

Ratings on this site are powered by the Ajax Ratings Pro plugin for Movable Type.

Search on this site is powered by the FastSearch plugin for Movable Type.

Blogrolls on this site are powered by the MT-Blogroll.

Temporary site design is based on Cutline and Cutline for MT. Graphics by Apothegm Designs.